Who are the two witnesses and what could “time, times and half a time” mean?, Revelation 11, Psalms 41, Daniel 12:7
You should know that I am not a defender of the Bible, the contradictions that I have found in it show a Roman manipulation of the genuine scriptures, even the book of Revelation contains inconsistencies and the events are not always in chronological order.
At the end of the translation I made of my comment, you will see an example of the contradictions I denounce. (A)
Who are the two witnesses and what could “time, times and half a time” mean?
I found a video on YouTube about the matter, and I left this comment there in Spanish, a very unique comment, that’s why I translated it into this language:
The first witness is Jesus, he has witnessed firsthand the fidelity of the scriptures, he died on the cross (Psalms 22), the second witness is another anointed one, this second anointed one at first does not know the truth, and that is why he sins, and that is why he does penance once he knows the truth and finds out that he has sinned, that is why the scripture says “dressed in sackcloth and sitting in ashes”, because this is how the Jews did penance for their sins, the second witness lives the rest of the prophecies firsthand: he confesses that he sinned, for example by eating pork, and in his ignorance he is betrayed, he is “dead”, his life was stolen, he is “dead” but he is alive, that is, he has been kidnapped, his life was stolen, his freedom was stolen, he did not enjoy his youth because they betrayed him, they betrayed him because he gave evidence of being faithful even though he did not yet know the truth, and he was faithful to women and religious beliefs that did not deserve his fidelity (Micah 7, Psalms 41, Psalms 109), then he learns that Roman fraud is included in the Bible itself (Psalms 118:13-25, Daniel 8:25), but he realizes after having sinned in the shadow of ignorance, for example : The prophecies in Psalms 41 and Psalms 91, which the Bible, by Roman whim, implies were already fulfilled with the supposed betrayal of Judas and supposed temptation of Jesus in the desert, are prophecies for the time of the end: the components of deception do not fit with the components of the truth, Psalms 91 says “a thousand will fall at your side”, but nor a thousand nor ten thousand unjust ones fell dead at Jesus’ side, the one who died was Jesus, Matthew 4 does not fit with Psalms 91, Psalms 41 It says “I have sinned, he who ate my bread lifted up his heel against me” but Jesus did not sin, it does not fit just as Ecclesiastes does not fit with Proverbs, you have cited Ecclesiastes in vain because it is not a text inspired by justice since it considers wisdom in excess as something bad, and it considers it bad, to be too righteous (Ecclesiastes 7:16), and that does not fit with the Proverbs since one is not “too righteous”, one is righteous and that’s it (Proverbs 29:27). ), furthermore Proverbs calls good the fact of being wiser and wiser, knowing more and more (Proverbs 9:9). And comparing Psalms 41:4-13, John 13:18 and 1 Peter 2:22, we see one of many lies, Jesus never sinned because he was educated in the true religion, his religion was the same one that Judas Maccabeus and the seven brothers had, these seven loyal jews were murdered by a Greek persecutor for refusing to eat pork (2 Maccabees 7), and in addition to being educated in the true religion, Jesus was faithful that is why he did not sin, but when he reincarnates he does sin, because he is born in the 3rd millennium without memories and in a world ruled by false religions arising from the 4th beast, the Roman empire, that is why God punishes it in a corrective way as Psalm 118 says, which is a prophecy to which he himself referred in the parable of the murderous husbandmen (Hosea 6:1-3, Psalms 118, Matthew 21:33-43), and when he finishes his penance, for a time, times and half a time (Daniel 12:7), then he will get the glory of heaven, he was not like the Greeks (he was not a friend of celibacy or putti, if I let myself understand, he only liked women, like a good son of the God who destroyed of Sodom), then, what he considers glory, as a good faithful Jew, son of the God that destroyed Sodom, is obviously the sacred marriage with a woman of flesh and blood, just, beautiful, and taken in her virginity (Isaiah 66:21, Leviticus 21:13, Revelation 1:6) , if you don’t approve this revealing comment, well, I’m not stupid, I’ll put it on my blog anyway, because I’m doing penance for having previously defended the Bible and for having worshiped the idols of the Catholic Church in my days of ignorance. Jesus himself is the second witness!. With the testimony of Jesus and with mine that defends him from slander and supports his truths, we together condemn “Babylon”, the hypocritical one that claims to defend Deuteronomy 19:15 to explain “the two witnesses”, while attacking Deuteronomy 11 with slander against the saints such as the messages of Roman authorship in Matthew 15:11, and 1 Timothy 4, if we were all idiots, perhaps they would have endless success, but unfortunately for the Roman empire that has become religious, there are beings more intelligent than the leaders of Babylon, than the Devil himself and his stupid rebellious angels.
(A)
Below I show you that the Bible is unbiblical with a small sample of its contradictions:
I have also translated this from another of my publications in Spanish:
There are many news items similar to the one below: Isn’t that paying good with evil? Wasn’t it a mistake to do good without looking at who? Yes, then the author of the phrase: “Do good without looking at to whom” is stupid.
They are looking for a Venezuelan cashier who stole 30 thousand soles from a bakery.
https://trome.com/actualidad/miraflores-venezolana-gano-confianza-dueno-panaderia-le-dan-caja-robo-30-mil-soles-forma-sistematica-133074/
They did her the good of giving a job to an evil woman, and how does she repay that favor? By harming those who did her good, she stole 30 thousand soles from the cash register where she worked as a cashier, which shows that the saying: “Do good without looking at who” is idiotic.
https://haselbienmirandoaquien.blogspot.com/2022/09/eclesiastico-124-en-tiempo-de-necesidad.html
“Do good without looking to whom” is similar to the biblical teaching: “Give to anyone who asks you”, what bad advice the Devil gives us in the Bible, isn’t it?
Luke 6:30 Give to anyone who asks you; And do not ask whoever takes what is yours to give it back to you.
No, it was not Jesus who said those things, it was the Roman Devil who said those things but he falsely accused Jesus of teaching such things. That is the subject of my work, to denounce the Roman slander against the saints, their Biblical fraud.
According to Luke 6:30, the injured party should not make an effort to recover what is theirs, but I do not pay attention, because I fight to recover the value of what a pepera woman stole from me, it is about S/. 10,000 in goods, she stole it from my room, when I drank a few glasses of wine with her, it was at the moment when I went to the bathroom, that she treacherously put a sleeping pill in my wine.
And what would the Devil ask me? To offer that woman the other cheek and look for her to invite her back to my room and let me be sedated again so that she can steal from me what she didn’t steal from me at the first opportunity. ?, is the Devil crazy!
Luke 6:29 If someone hits you on one cheek, offer him the other also; and if someone takes your cloak, let him take your shirt too.
F U Satan!
| I have survived – My amazing real survival story in the roads of the highlands of Peru, year 2005.
|
| I rejected Sandra Elizabeth’s curse, so come with me Luz Victoria because you are my blessing.
|
| Con poderoso rayo invisible a los enemigos, OVNI destruye templo de Atenea, Sandrori llora su ruina.
|
Entiéndeme 
