If you don’t like being deceived then don’t believe in the Bible, here I show you some of its lies.

Defending the Bible and being in favor of the death penalty is incompatible, that is why I do not defend the Bible, I denounce its inconsistencies, can you help me?
Years ago I saw a news story that happened in Brazil, two women murdered a 9-year-old boy, Rhuan Maycon: https://sputniknews.lat/20190621/asesinato-nino-rhuan-juan-brasil-ideologia-genero-1087731520. html – https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_Rhuan_da_Silva

I would have wanted the death penalty for these murderers, that’s why years ago, I uploaded a video titled: Christianity is in favor of the death penalty – The Case of Rhuan Maycon.

But I must clarify that when you say you are a Christian, they immediately associate you with being a defender of the Bible, if we are referring to that type of Christian, then I am not a Christian, I was referring to true Christianity, the one that was not based on Bible, but since no one knows it, then I say:

I am not a Christian because the typical Christian leader claims to base his faith on the Bible, and among those who love the Bible there are pastors and priests who rape children,
only people like that could love impunity for their own crimes,
I am referring to the non-legality of punishment that I consider to be the only appropriate punishment for such evil:
the death penalty.

It is an impunity based on respect for certain country,
That country is small in territory, but not small in influence,
That country has embassies in various countries of the world,
That country has a yellow and white banner,
As the Ceasar of the Roman empire had coins with the image his face,
that country mint coins with images of the faces of its supreme leaders.
and that country is the Vatican,
whose main book, the Bible,
contains an absurd doctrine from whom they call “Their savior”,
doctrine which says:
“Love your enemy, because an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth stopped being justice with my arrival”,
Will they tell victims of sexual abuse to love their rapists?

Each one defends his own people, right?,

If Michael is on the side of the good people,

Who is the Devil on the side of?,

Who would defend such despicable people but the Devil himself?

If the Devil had children,
If there were people who fit the profile of the Devil’s son,
Wouldn’t the Devil be the only one interested in saving them from a just punishment?

Wouldn’t the Devil be the only one damaged by justice?

I believe that God exists and that he is just, the doctrine of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and life for life seems to me to be a just doctrine to the extent that the aggressor initiates it without justification.
Only the Devil could oppose God.
The Christ that those who call themselves Christians follow is the devil because he opposes the justice of God.

I am a man who wants the legalized death penalty for rapists, extortionists, murderers, swindlers, kidnappers, and those who seek the death of innocent people through slander;
desiring that and being a defender of the Bible are incompatible.

It is not worth becoming a Christian because Christianity is based on the Bible, and the Bible is based on Roman lies.

Revelation 12:7-12 Then war broke out in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back.

And because the army of Michael has prevailed:

12 Therefore rejoice, you heavens
and you who dwell in them!
But woe to the earth and the sea,
because the devil has gone down to you!
He is filled with fury,
because he knows that his time is short.”

Deuteronomy 32:43 “Rejoice with him, O heavens;
bow down to him, all gods, for he avenges the blood of his children
and takes vengeance on his adversaries.
He repays those who hate him
and cleanses his people’s land.”

44 Moses came and recited all the words of this song in the hearing of the people, he and Joshua the son of Nun.

Damn dirty ape, can you understand me?

I will show you a lie which is a drop in a sea of lies in the Bible; but before : In a single image, in the one below, I tell you what motivates me to create these articles.

I expose the Roman lies in the Bible because at my ignorance I followed bad Roman advice in the Bible which made me sin and fall at the feet of a slanderous and treacherous woman.

My words instants before the three coward men, friends of Sandra Bazan, began to attack me with kicks and stones, in front of her, when she had slandered me accusing me falsely of sexual harassment (1998): (C ).

I answered: “What? No, I am not harassing her, it is not harassing, in my letter I ask her:” Sandra, what do you want from me? I did all this for you, but you call me, you tell me to look for you and when I look for you, you reject me and insult me (but I pray for you because the Bible says … “thanks for your ‘wise’ advice, Satan!! (I am being ironic)”), what happens to you? What do you want from me? Do you love me inside and act that way because this is my ex’s witchcraft.

Do you act this way because you have entered a sect? Are you making fun of me? Tell me what’s wrong! “, That’s not harassment. (D)

It is not worth becoming a Christian because Christianity is based on the Bible, and the Bible is based on Roman lies.

A story with deceit: Saint Stephen stoned to death. The why I not a Christian nor a Bible defender.

There is something very strange about the story of Stephen’s death by stoning.

Notice Stephen’s attitude moments before he was killed as the Bible says, read how he addressed those he considered wicked:

Acts 7:51 Stiff-necked, and uncircumcised in heart and hearing. You always resist the Holy Spirit; Like your parents, so do you. 52 Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they slew those who foretold the coming of the Righteous One, of whom you have now been betrayers and slayers;

His attitude against the wicked is in harmony with the proverb that says the righteous hate the wicked: Proverbs 29:27.

The fact that Stephen was stoned by the wicked confirms what that proverb also says: The wicked hate the righteous.

But in his agony, something that doesn’t fit happens, suddenly Stephen, from behaving like an aggressive lion against the wicked, behaves like a meek kitten with the wicked, and that doesn’t make sense, it doesn’t make any sense:

Stephen’s death and his sudden change of attitude makes the narrative hardly believable.
Acts 7:58 And they stoned Stephen, while he cried out, and said, Lord, hold them not to account for this sin. And having said this, he died.
A very strange change of attitude for someone who moments before had spoken firmly and hatefully to his enemies.

Now read this:
Revelation 6:9-10 Those who had been put to death for the word of God and for their testimony cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Stephen is supposed to be one of them, but here he is not seen interceding for them to be forgiven for killing him.

This contradiction is not a symptom of the fact that you, who agree with me and I, do not understand the scriptures as the defenders of the Bible would say, this is not an “apparent contradiction”, as they would say. The contradiction is real and is symptomatic of a Roman fraud in the Bible. It also makes no sense for St. Stephen to address a creature and not God in his last prayer, but that is another fraud that I have removed from Acts 7:58 to focus on the feelings of the saints toward those who killed them. Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked, the prophecy in Psalm 58:10 confirms those feelings, contrasting Matthew 5:38 with Revelation 6:9 demonstrates based on logic, that the Bible does not deserve the credit that many rulers of various countries of the world give it by swearing with their hand on the Bible when assuming their public offices.

Everything becomes so untrustworthy that it is worth asking, did Stephen argue with Jews or with Romans?, did the Jews stone him or did the Romans stone him but the Romans blamed the Jews?, even: did Stephen really exist?, the Jews did not eat pork, but oh what a coincidence, in Matthew 15:11 the Bible says that Jesus said: they can eat everything, that doesn’t square with the prophecies of Isaiah in the last chapter of the book Isaiah. Do you realize the anti-Jewish tone of the Bible? It has texts from Judaism, but they are denied in its false New Testament.

Now read this:
Revelation 6:9-10 Those who had been put to death for the word of God and for their testimony cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Stephen is supposed to be one of them, but here he wants to be avenged, he wants the sin of those who murdered him to be taken into account.

The Ironies of the Gospel in the Bible:

Come to me, all you who are tired, and I will make you walk two miles instead of one mile. (Matthew 11:28, Matthew 5:41)

 Razón para no ser cristiano, se basa en la Biblia, y la Biblia se basa calumnias del imperio romano.

 ¿María Madre de Dios?, Dios no tiene madre ni padre. Dios es eterno, vive pero no ha nacido ni muere

 El amor de Dios, un hermoso mensaje de amor que solo al Diablo y a sus seguidores puede perturbar.

I do what they would do (Revelation 12:7), I fight against the false testimonies against God, and the Bible includes those false testimonies, that’s why Revelation 12:9 says what it says: the Bible is part of that world deception. With these words: Revelation 22:18 I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will bring upon him the plagues that are written in this book. 19 And if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the book of life, and from the holy city and from the things that are written in this book. John was not referring to the Bible, the Bible did not exist, John was referring to the true gospel that consisted of cursing enemies, not blessing them as the lie states in Matthew 5:38-48, precisely for this reason he curses to those whom he knew would adulterate the words even of the book of that book that he wrote, however no lie is solid, no saint died feeling love for their enemies who murdered them, this passage evidences it: Revelation 6:10 And They cried out loud, saying: How long, Lord, Holy and True, do you not judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on earth? God is also vengeful, and that passage makes it clear: Revelation 16:5 And I heard the angel of the waters saying, You are just, O Lord, who art and was, the Holy One, because you have judged these things. . 6 Because they shed the blood of saints and prophets, you have also given them blood to drink; well they deserve it. 7 I also heard another, who from the altar said: Indeed, Lord God Almighty, your judgments are true and just. Love for enemies based on a God who loves his enemies is part of the Roman lies in the gospel.

The love of enemies is a deception of the enemy of God, the denial of the law that prohibits the consumption of foods such as pork and bats is also a deception; The Bible has lies from the empire that never converted to the faith that it persecuted, the Roman empire persecuted that faith to destroy it by Hellenizing it. In the version of the gospel falsified by the Romans in Matthew 15:11 Jesus tells us (To deny the law in Deuteronomy 14): «Eat everything because nothing that enters a man’s mouth contaminates him», the Romans are thus accusing Jesus of something that as a faithful Jew he never said: Like Antiochus IV Epiphanes, they had in mind to Hellenize the true religion. The gospel was Hellenized by the Romans, like the face of Zeus, so they tell us with the images that it was the face of Jesus; and the doctrine of the Greek Cleobulus of Lindos is the one that says: «Love your enemy», but they tell us that Jesus taught it: And that is a lie. Antiochus IV Epiphanes tortured eight Jews, seven brothers and his mother because they refused to eat pork because God forbids it (Leviticus 11, 2 Maccabees 7). The prophecy in Isaiah 65 confirms two things: 1 # God loves his friends and hates his enemies. 2# The consumption of pork is confirmed prohibited. Antiochus, the Greek king: «Would you like to eat pork so they won’t cut your body to pieces? (2 Maccabees 7:7).» Zeus, the Greek god: «Nothing that I God did is bad if you receive it by praying to me, are they going to refuse to eat pork?,  worship me all, those who don’t, go to eternal fire (1 Timothy 4:3 , Hebrews 1:6, Luke 11:28, Matthew 18:7).» The phrase: «Do good to your friends and enemies, because in this way you will preserve the ones and it will be possible for you to attract the others.» It is from Cleobulus of Lindos, «love your enemy is another way of saying the same thing», but that contradicts the law and the prophets, Jesus respected the word of God, but the Roman persecutors did not.