Íomhá an Bheithígh, an Bheithíoch féin agus cúisitheoir ár ndeartháireacha, iad siúd a thóg fianaise bhréagach i gcoinne an aingil Ghabriél chun idolatraí agus bréag a chur chun cinn █
Deir an Nochtadh 13:18 rud an-chruinn:
‘Anseo tá eagna. An té a bhfuil tuiscint aige, ríomhadh sé uimhir an Bheithígh, óir is uimhir duine í: 666.’
Anois cuir é seo i gcomparáid le Dainéil 12:10:
‘Tuigfidh na daoine tuisceanacha, ach ní thuigfidh na daoine olca.’
Agus le Seanfhocail 28:5:
‘Ní thuigeann na h-olc an ceartas, ach tuigeann iad siúd a lorgaíonn Dia é.’
Tá an ceangal díreach: ní thuigeann an t-olc; tuigeann an tuisceanach.
Dá bhrí sin, más féidir an Bheithíoch a aithint amháin ag an té a bhfuil tuiscint aige, agus mura dtuigeann an t-olc, ní féidir leis an mBeithíoch a bheith ina dhuine tuisceanach: is é an t-olc an Bheithíoch.
Agus seo an cheist dheireanach: má rinne an t-olc géarleanúint ar an teachtaireacht chóir, mura n-iarr sé aithrí agus mura ndearna sé aithrí, conas a d’fhéadfadh sé an rud a ndearna sé géarleanúint air a chaomhnú go dílis? Más é ceartas don fhíréan a bhí sa teachtaireacht bhunaidh, ach cáineadh don olc, cé a raibh leas aige í a athrú? Smaoinigh air.
Is é íomhá an Bheithígh, mar sin, idol an ghéarleanúna. An dealbh, an íomhá a n-umhlaíonn an neamhchráifeach os a comhair chun guí, an neamhchráifeach a fheargann i gcoinne an té a deir leis: ‘Seo, in Eaxodus 20:5, tá sé seo toirmiscthe.’ Ná hiarr orm é seo a dhéanamh leat. Má mhaireann tú ar adhradh na híomhá sin, déan é gan mise.
Ghuigh an Róimh a rinne géarleanúint ar Íosa os comhair dealbha a ndéithe agus a ndéithe ban iomadúla, amhail Mars agus Iúpatar. Sa lá atá inniu ann feicimid na pearsanra céanna ina ndealbha; níl ach a n-ainmneacha athraithe. Féach, mar shampla, ar an té a nglaotar ‘Naomh Mhícheál an t-Ard-Aingeal’ air: i ndáiríre, is géarleanúna Rómhánach adhrtha é, a ndia Mars. Agus is gan amhras gurb é an fear le gruaig fhada Zeus nó Iúpatar athainmnithe.
D’ith adhrthóirí Zeus feoil mhuc, agus ceadaíonn an Róimh í a ithe ag tagairt do Mhatha 15:11 agus 1 Tiomóid 4:1–6. Ach de réir Mhatha 5:17–18, níor tháinig Íosa chun an Dlí ná na fáithe a chur ar ceal; is Dlí é Deotranaimí 14 agus cuireann sé cosc ar fheoil mhuc a ithe, agus is fáidh é Íseáia, agus cáineann a fháistine in Íseáia 65 feoil mhuc a ithe. Mura raibh meas ag an Róimh ar an Dlí, shaobh sí é freisin; dá bhrí sin níl ciall ann an Sean-Tiomna ar fad a chosaint, seachas an rud atá cóir.
Ní ionann cúiseamh cóir agus clúmhilleadh. Labhraíonn an Nochtadh 12:10 faoi chúisitheoir ár ndeartháireacha, is é sin, iad siúd a dhéanann clúmhilleadh orthu. Ní hamháin gur chuir siad teachtaireachtaí éagóracha agus teachtaireachtaí ar son idolatraí i leith na naomh, ach rinne siad clúmhilleadh freisin trí íomhánna a cuireadh ina leith agus a caitheadh mar idolta—íomhánna a mheasfadh na naoimh mar mhaslach.
Trí íomhánna Heilléanacha, eachtrannacha do na naoimh, tugadh fianaise bhréagach faoi chuma fhisiciúil agus nádúr fireann fir Dé; rinneadh masla orthu, mar a rinneadh masla ar Lot agus ar na haingil fhíréanta i Sodom (féach: Geineasas 19:5–13; Nochtadh 13:6). Léiríonn 1 Corantaigh 11:1–14 gur masla don fhear é gruaig fhada a chaitheamh, agus séanann breithiúnas na náisiún i Matha 25:31–46 an fhoirceadal grá uilíoch gan idirdhealú.
Dearbhaíonn an Nochtadh 12:9–12 go meallann an Dragún an domhan ar fad agus go mbuafaidh sé sa deireadh ag am an bhreithiúnais, a chuirfear i gcrích trí fhianaise na naomh; de réir an Nochtaithe 20:3–6, bhí siad dílis do Dhia ina saolta roimhe seo, ag diúltú idolta a adhradh, fiú dá gcosnódh sé a mbeatha—maraíodh iad ag an mBeithíoch (an t-éagórach), a d’éiligh go ndéanfaí ‘íomhá an Bheithígh’ a adhradh.
Is creideamh é dogma a fhorchuirtear mar rud neamhcheistithe. Sainmhíníonn reiligiúin institiúideacha glacadh mar ortadócsacht agus cáineadh mar eiriceacht. Cé go bhfuil a gcuid dogmaí ag cur as dá chéile, maíonn a gceannairí go ‘dtéann gach cosán chuig Dia.’ Nochtann an ráiteas sin iad: má thagann na dogmaí salach ar a chéile, ní féidir leis na cosáin sin a bheith fíor. Tagann dogmaí salach ar a chéile; ní thagann dhá fhírinne salach ar a chéile riamh—comhlánaíonn siad a chéile.
Anseo taispeántar conas a chúisigh géarleanúnaithe Rómhánacha, in ainm an Dragúin, ‘ár ndeartháireacha,’ lena n-áirítear teachtaire dílis cosúil le Gabriél, as teachtaireachtaí a thabhairt a bhí i gcoinne an cheartais.
AN DOGMA COITIANTA (An Chríostaíocht agus an tIoslam): an mhaighdeanas buan.
Maíonn an Chríostaíocht agus an tIoslam gur fhógair Gabriél breith mhaighdeanach Íosa chun Íseáia a chomhlíonadh (Matha 1 / an Córan 19). Ach ní fhógraíonn Íseáia 7:14–16 Íosa, ná ní labhraíonn sé faoi ‘mhaighdeanas buan.’ Tugadh an comhartha don rí Achaz agus bhí air a chomhlíonadh láithreach, sula mbeadh an leanbh in ann idirdhealú a dhéanamh idir an mhaith agus an t-olc. Labhraíonn Íseáia faoi bhean óg, ní faoi bhean a d’fhanfadh ina maighdean tar éis breithe.
Tagann an comhlíonadh le Hizicíá, rí dílis in aimsir Achaz:
- Scrios sé an nathair chré-umha (2 Ríthe 18:4–7)
- Bhí Dia leis (Imanúél)
- An bua i gcoinne na n-Asarach a fáistíodh ag Íseáia (2 Ríthe 19:35–37)
Ní as Íseáia a thagann an bhreith mhaighdeanach bhuan, atá coitianta don Chríostaíocht agus don Ioslam, ach as athléamh níos déanaí a forchuireadh ag an Róimh. Ní thagann na contrárthachtaí seo ó Dhia. Tagann siad ón Róimh. Níor theastaigh ón impireacht thíoránta pobail a chosnódh a ndínit, ach pobail ar a nglúine. Is ionann lúbadh os comhair siombailí agus lúbadh os comhair na ndaoine a fhorchuireann iad.
Nochtadh 12:9
‘Agus caitheadh an Dragún mór amach, an té a mheallann an domhan ar fad; caitheadh síos ar an talamh é, agus caitheadh a aingil síos in éineacht leis.’
Nochtadh 12:12
‘Dá bhrí sin, déanaigí gairdeas, a spéartha, agus sibhse a chónaíonn iontu (féach Sailm 110:1–3; 118:17–20; Óisé 6:2; Sailm 90:4; 91:7). Mairg don talamh agus don fharraige, mar tá an diabhal tagtha anuas chugaibh le fearg mhór, ós eol dó nach bhfuil ach beagán ama aige.’ (féach Dainéil 8:25; 12:10)

In Comas so that you do not eat her, serpent!, «The virgin of the door will believe me and not you.» (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/rFbRMVqIMWg
Psalms 110:7 – The water of life – The water of truth. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/pbG0vPPsn9M
https://shewillfindme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/idi02-judgment-against-babylon-english.pdf .»
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: “I will take vengeance on My enemies!”
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called “love for the enemy” that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.
Rome invented lies to protect criminals and destroy God’s justice. “From the traitor Judas to the convert Paul”
I thought they were doing witchcraft on her, but she was the witch. These are my arguments. ( https://eltrabajodegabriel.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/idi02-the-religion-i-defend-is-named-justice.pdf
) –
Is that all your power, wicked witch?
Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. █
Night was falling on the main road.
A blanket of darkness covered the winding path that wound through the mountains.
He did not walk aimlessly.
His goal was freedom, but the journey had only just begun.
With his body numb from the cold and his stomach empty for days,
he had no company but the elongated shadow cast by the headlights of the trucks that roared beside him,
advancing without stopping, indifferent to his presence.
Every step was a challenge,
every curve a new trap from which he had to emerge unscathed.
For seven nights and mornings,
he was forced to advance along the thin yellow line of a narrow road with just two lanes,
while trucks, buses and trailers whizzed by just inches from his body.
In the darkness, the deafening roar of engines enveloped him,
and the lights of trucks coming from behind cast their glow on the mountain in front of him.
At the same time, other trucks approached in the opposite direction,
forcing him to decide in fractions of a second
whether to pick up the pace or remain still in his precarious crossing,
where every movement meant the difference between life and death.
Hunger was a beast that devoured him from the inside,
but the cold was no less merciless.
In the sierra, the early hours of the morning were invisible claws that penetrated to the bones.
The wind enveloped him with its icy breath,
as if it wanted to extinguish the last spark of life that remained to him.
He took refuge where he could,
sometimes under a bridge,
other times in a corner of concrete that offered him a minimum of shelter.
But the rain was unforgiving.
Water seeped into his torn clothes,
sticking to his skin and stealing what little warmth he still had.
The trucks continued their march,
and he, stubbornly hoping that someone would feel sorry,
raised his hand, waiting for a gesture of humanity.
But the drivers drove on.
Some with looks of contempt,
others simply ignoring him, as if he were a ghost.
Every now and then, a compassionate soul would stop and offer him a quick ride,
but they were few.
Most saw him as a nuisance,
a shadow on the road,
someone not worth helping.
On one of those endless nights,
desperation drove him to search for food among the scraps left by travelers.
He was not ashamed to admit it:
he fought for food with pigeons,
snatching pieces of hardened biscuits before they could make them disappear.
It was an unequal fight,
but he was determined:
he was not willing to kneel before any image,
nor to accept any man as ‘only lord and savior’.
He was not willing to please those sinister individuals
who had already kidnapped him three times over religious differences,
who with their slanders had led him to walk that yellow line.
At another time, a kind man offered him a piece of bread and a drink.
A small gesture,
but in his pain,
that kindness was a balm.
But indifference was the norm.
When he asked for help,
many would walk away,
as if they feared that his misery was contagious.
Sometimes, a simple ‘no’ was enough to extinguish all hope,
but on other occasions, contempt was reflected in cold words or empty looks.
He didn’t understand how they could ignore someone who could barely stand,
how they could watch a man collapse without batting an eyelid.
And yet, he kept going.
Not because he had the strength,
but because he had no other choice.
He continued down the road,
leaving behind him miles of asphalt,
nights without rest and days without food.
Adversity hit him with everything it had,
but he resisted.
Because deep down,
even in the most absolute desperation,
the spark of survival still burned within him,
fueled by the desire for freedom and justice.
Psalm 118:17
‘I will not die, but I will live to proclaim the works of the Lord.
18 The Lord has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death.’
Psalm 41:4
‘I said, ‘Lord, have mercy on me
and heal me, for I confess with repentance that I have sinned against You.’’
Job 33:24-25
‘God will have mercy on him and say, ‘Deliver him from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom;
25 his flesh shall become fresher than in childhood, and he shall return to the days of his youth.’’
Psalm 16:8
‘I have set the Lord always before me;
because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken.’
Psalm 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in Your presence, there is fullness of joy;
at Your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.’
Psalm 41:11-12
‘By this, I will know that You are pleased with me:
if my enemy does not triumph over me.
12 As for me, You uphold me in my integrity
and set me in Your presence forever.’
Revelation 11:4
‘These witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.’
Isaiah 11:2
‘The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him:
the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord.’
________________________________________
I made the mistake of defending the faith in the Bible, but out of ignorance. However, now I see that it is not the guiding book of the religion that Rome persecuted, but of the one it created to please itself with celibacy. That’s why they preached a Christ who doesn’t marry a woman, but rather His church, and angels who, despite having male names, do not look like men (draw your own conclusions). These figures are akin to the false saints—plaster-statue kissers—and similar to the Greco-Roman gods because, in fact, they are the same pagan gods under different names.
What they preach is a message incompatible with the interests of true saints. Therefore, this is my penance for that unintentional sin. By denying one false religion, I deny them all. And when I finish doing my penance, then God will forgive me and bless me with her, with that special woman I need. Because, although I don’t believe in the entire Bible, I do believe in what seems right and consistent to me within it; the rest is slander from the Romans.
Proverbs 28:13
‘He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy from the Lord.’
Proverbs 18:22
‘He who finds a wife finds a treasure and receives favor from the Lord.’
I seek the Lord’s favor incarnated in that special woman. She must be as the Lord commands me to be. If this upsets you, it’s because you have lost:
Leviticus 21:14
‘A widow, or a divorced woman, or a defiled woman, or a prostitute, he shall not marry these, but he shall marry a virgin from his own people.’
To me, she is glory:
1 Corinthians 11:7
‘Woman is the glory of man.’
Glory is victory, and I will find it with the power of light. Therefore, even though I don’t know her yet, I have named her: Light Victory.
And I nicknamed my web pages ‘UFOs’ because they travel at the speed of light, reaching corners of the world and shooting out rays of truth that strike down the slanderers. With the help of my web pages, I will find her, and she will find me.
When she finds me and I find her, I will tell her this:
‘You have no idea how many programming algorithms I had to devise to find you. You can’t imagine all the difficulties and adversaries I faced to find you, my Light of Victory.
I faced death itself many times:
Even a witch pretended to be you. Imagine, she told me she was the light, despite her slanderous behavior. She slandered me like no one else, but I defended myself like no one else to find you. You are a being of light; that’s why we were made for each other!
Now let’s get out of this damn place…
So this is my story. I know she will understand me, and so will the righteous.
This is what I did at the end of 2005, when I was 30 years old.
https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/themes-phrases-24languages.xlsx
Haz clic para acceder a gemini-and-i-speak-about-my-history-and-my-righteous-claims-idi02.pdf
Haz clic para acceder a gemini-y-yo-hablamos-de-mi-historia-y-mis-reclamos-de-justicia-idi01.pdf
Park Taunusanlage, Frankfurt, Germany – November 2017 (Video language: German) https://youtu.be/CGvAOMAu3ZQ
1 The Age of the Internet: the age of revelations, of automatic translations, and of judgment-time tools with global reach. https://eltestimoniodegabriel.link/2025/05/24/the-age-of-the-internet-the-age-of-revelations-of-automatic-translations-and-of-doomsday-tools-with-global-reach/ 2 Pas op voor het geloof in het evangelie van de antichrist (goed nieuws voor de onrechtvaardigen, hoewel vals) , Dutch , https://144k.xyz/2025/01/22/pas-op-voor-het-geloof-in-het-evangelie-van-de-antichrist-goed-nieuws-voor-de-onrechtvaardigen-hoewel-vals-%e2%94%82-dutch-%e2%94%82/ 3 A vitória das forças celestes, o triunfo das forças do céu. https://144k.xyz/2024/11/27/a-vitoria-das-forcas-celestes-o-triunfo-das-forcas-do-ceu/ 4 No soy ateo, al contrario soy creyente en Dios y por ello estoy indignado con esta estafa acerca del plan de Dios, por eso el título de este artículo es: El fraude de los romanos en la Biblia explicado como quizás nadie más lo ha hecho jamás. https://ellameencontrara.com/2024/01/06/no-soy-ateo-al-contrario-soy-creyente-en-dios-y-por-ello-estoy-indignado-con-esta-estafa-acerca-del-plan-de-dios-por-eso-el-titulo-de-este-articulo-es-el-fraude-de-los-romanos-en-la-biblia-explic/ 5 O estás con el Imperio Romano y sus calumnias contra Jehová o estás con Jehová, tú decides. https://afavordelajusticiapropiadelosjustos.blogspot.com/2023/01/o-estas-con-el-imperio-romano-y-sus.html

«If God loves the world, why does Jesus not pray for it? According to John 3:16: ‘God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, so that everyone who believes in Him should not perish…’ But Psalm 82 speaks of more than one son of God, not of just one. Moreover, Psalm 5:5 says that God hates the wicked. So how can one love a wicked world? Isaiah 13:11–12 is clear: ‘I will punish the world for its evil… I will make mankind scarcer than fine gold.’ He who loves desires to save the beloved. Why would God want to save the wicked, if Proverbs 16:4 says that the wicked was created for the day of evil? Furthermore, Psalm 135:6 states: ‘Whatever Jehovah pleases, He does, in heaven and on earth.’ If God loves the world so much and can do all things, He could save everyone. If He does not do so, it is not because He cannot, but because He does not want to. And Proverbs 17:15 says that God abhors the one who justifies the wicked. So how does justifying the world fit in? How can it be possible that God loves the world so much, but the supposed one sent by Him to save the world, according to the Bible, does not pray for the world? John 17:9 clearly says: ‘I do not pray for the world.’ Conclusion: the book contradicts itself. These contradictions come from Rome: a tyrannical empire that struck peoples on the cheeks would never want peoples to defend themselves, but rather to offer the other cheek. https://shewillfindme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/idi02-judgment-against-babylon-english.pdf .» «What’s ideal for you isn’t ideal for everyone. What’s fair is fair for everyone, but not everyone likes it. The Wisdom of Greece in the Bible: The way of evil: Love the wicked, Love your enemy: Doctrine of Men: ‘Do good to your friends and enemies, for thus you will preserve the former and be able to attract the latter.’ Cleobulus of Lindos (6th century BC) The path of good: Hate the wicked, hate your enemy. God’s doctrine given through a holy man: Deuteronomy 19:20 And those who remain will hear and fear, and they will not commit such wickedness among you again. 21 And you shall have no compassion on them; life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. Moses (13th century BC). The thinking of Cleobulus of Lindos, reflected in his teaching, ‘Every man is a friend or an enemy according to how you conduct yourself toward him,’ resembles the Golden Rule: ‘Treat others as you wish to be treated.’ However, the Bible itself contradicts this idea in Ecclesiasticus 12:5-7 and Psalm 109:4-5, which warns that some will return evil for good and hatred for love. This demonstrates that the Golden Rule is not always followed, as there are those who act with ingratitude and malice regardless of how they are treated. Likewise, Cleobulus’s idea of moderation finds a parallel in Ecclesiastes 7:16: ‘Do not be overly righteous, nor overly wise; why should you destroy yourself?’ suggesting that an excess of justice and wisdom can be harmful. However, this contradicts other passages such as Revelation 22:11: ‘Let the righteous do righteousness, and let the holy be holy even more,’ which commands constant growth in righteousness. It also clashes with Proverbs 4:7, which states: ‘Wisdom is the principal thing; get wisdom, and over all your possessions get understanding,’ exalting wisdom without limit. These contradictions reflect how the Scriptures have been influenced by different schools of thought. Ecclesiastes, with its skeptical and philosophical tone, seems to lean toward the Greek prudence of moderation, while Proverbs and Revelation promote an absolutist view of justice and wisdom.
Scene 1: Under the ideal legislation of Cleobulus of Lindos.
The extortionist monkey is injured during a police chase. He is taken to a public hospital, his wounds heal, he receives shelter, food, and protection in prison, and is later released without being sentenced to death; the monkey repeats his crimes.
This is wrong, the wicked one triumphs!
The extortionist monkey: ‘Obey the Bible and love me, you are my admirers!’
Scene 2: Under the ideal legislation of Moses
While escaping from the police, the extortionist monkey has an accident, no one helps him, and he dies:
What a great moment! The wicked one is having a bad time.
The extortionist monkey in his agony: ‘Wicked sinners, rejoice in my calamity because you are enemies of God.’
A man approached the beast and said, ‘It is not as you said. The wicked sinner is you, and so are those who falsified God’s words to justify the doctrine of love for one’s enemies. You are a sinner not because of ignorance, but because you are unjust. God hates the unjust because God is just. The sinners God loves are the righteous, because they do not sin because they are unjust, but because of ignorance. The righteous, in defending your life, were ignorant.’ I used to oppose the death penalty, even the justified one, because I was deceived by Rome’s frauds. They made me believe that ‘Thou shalt not kill’ was a commandment equivalent to ‘Thou shalt not take the life of a human being under any circumstances,’ which seeks to demonize righteous executioners and leave those who kill unjustly without just punishment, until I learned the truth and stopped committing that sin. To curse the institution that defended lives like yours for being led precisely by people like you, and not by righteous people, it has been written: Revelation 18:6 Repay her as she has repaid, and give back to her double according to her deeds; into the cup she has mixed, mix double for her. Where do you see here that we should not condemn you to death for your crimes under the cover of a gospel of undeserved love? What is revealed is the truth, the truth that Rome hid. What is not deserved is not just, and if something is not just, it is something that God does not approve of. Therefore, God does not approve of this slander of Rome in the Bible: Ephesians 3:7-9
‘Because of his undeserved love, God gave me the privilege of ministering to him by proclaiming this good news with the effective help of his power.’ God approves this truth, which Rome did not hide, for it wanted to use some truths as camouflage, but that was the mistake of ‘Babylon,’ pretending to be a saint when it is a harlot: Revelation 16:5 And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which is and which wast, the Holy One, for Thou hast judged these things. 6 Because they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, Thou hast also given them blood to drink; for they deserve it. 7 And I heard another from the altar say, Surely, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous are Thy judgments.
It is not that simple, it is not that obvious. Many things said about Moses and the prophets are not true either, because the fraud of the Roman Empire goes beyond merely falsifying the words of the righteous messengers whom they killed on crosses and also in their coliseum. The empire that created stories in your favor was an empire that demanded life for criminals, but demanded innocent blood. If there was a people who demanded the death of Jesus in exchange for the life of Barabbas, it was not the persecuted Jewish people; it was the bloodthirsty Roman people, who, as was to be expected from savages, slandered the Jews and falsified their religion. But now, according to the true word of God, there will be a reckoning, things will be restored in justice, the righteous will live even if many monkeys have to fall for them: Isaiah 43:3 For I, the Lord your God, the Holy One of Israel, am your Savior; I have given Egypt for your ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for you. 4 For you have been precious in my sight and honored, and I have loved you; therefore I will give men for you, and nations for your life. 5 Fear not, for I am with you; I will bring your offspring from the east, and gather you from the west. 6 I will say to the north, Give hither; and to the south, Do not hold back; bring my sons from far away, and my daughters from the ends of the earth, 7 all who are called by my name; for my glory I created them; I formed them and made them. Revelation 7:2 And I saw another angel ascending from the rising of the sun, having the seal of the living God; and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels to whom it was given to harm the earth and the sea, 3 Saying, Do not harm the earth or the sea or the trees until we have sealed the servants of our God on their foreheads. Now you can go to hell, monkey. I already told you what I had to tell you, have horrible agony so that you may become accustomed to the hell that awaits you.
¿Cuál es la legislación ideal? Lo que es ideal para ti, no es ideal para todos. Pero lo que es justo, es justo para todos pero no les gusta a todos.
No me dejo manipular por hipócritas, mi defensa a la legalización de la pena de muerte justificada se mantiene firme: Las últimas palabras de un asesino antes de ser ejecutado por un verdugo justiciero, fueron contrarias a la justicia, lo cual confirma su injusticia.https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/idi02-the-pauline-epistles-and-the-other-lies-of-rome-in-the-bible.pdf .» «The religion I defend is named justice. █ I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say. The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’ 📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
El propósito de Dios no es el propósito de Roma. Las religiones de Roma conducen a sus propios intereses y no al favor de Dios.
Haz clic para acceder a idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.pdf
https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.docx She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me. ( https://ellameencontrara.com – https://lavirgenmecreera.com – https://shewillfind.me ) This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible: Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army. Psalm 2:2-4 ‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying: ‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’ Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them. The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down: Isaiah 2:8-11 8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. 9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them. 10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty. 11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day. Proverbs 19:14 House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife. Revelation 1:6 And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. 1 Corinthians 11:7 The woman is the glory of man. What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army? The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army. Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.Un duro golpe de realidad es a “Babilonia” la “resurrección” de los justos, que es a su vez la reencarnación de Israel en el tercer milenio: La verdad no destruye a todos, la verdad no duele a todos, la verdad no incomoda a todos: Israel, la verdad, nada más que la verdad, la verdad que duele, la verdad que incomoda, verdades que duelen, verdades que atormentan, verdades que destruyen.This is my story: José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://lavirgenmecreera.com,
https://ovni03.blogspot.com, and other blogs.
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old. At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: ovni03.blogspot.com and in this video:
Haz clic para acceder a ten-piedad-de-mi-yahve-mi-dios.pdf
The day I almost committed suicide on the Villena Bridge (Miraflores, Lima) because of religious persecution and the side effects of the drugs I was forced to consume: Year 2001, age: 26 years.
»
Number of days of purification: Day # 35 https://144k.xyz/2025/12/15/i-decided-to-exclude-pork-seafood-and-insects-from-my-diet-the-modern-system-reintroduces-them-without-warning/
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .DOCX you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/math21-progam-code-in-turbo-pascal-bestiadn-dot-com.pdf
If P/87=74.14 then P=6450.18
Zeul grec Zeus și regele grec Antioh al IV-lea Epifan – urâciunea pustiirii. https://ntiend.me/2023/08/16/zeul-grec-zeus-si-regele-grec-antioh-al-iv-lea-epifan-uraciunea-pustiirii/
¿Dónde está el cielo dónde se desarrolla la guerra entonces? En la tierra, se trata de la segunda vida de los que han reencarnado para librar esa guerra final entre la justicia y la injusticia. https://bestiadn.com/2025/04/07/donde-esta-el-cielo-donde-se-desarrolla-la-guerra-entonces-en-la-tierra-se-trata-de-la-segunda-vida-de-los-que-han-reencarnado-para-librar-esa-guerra-final-entre-la-justicia-y-la-injusticia/
The false prophet conceals contradictions he cannot explain; he calls them ‘apparent’. The true prophet reveals them, even though they have been venerated as ‘sacred truths’ for centuries. They deceive you to your face, but you don’t realize it because you’re not aware of these details. A single question proves that idol worship is useless.»


















































