Գազանի պատկերը, գազանը և մեր եղբայրների մեղադրողը, նրանք, ովքեր կեղծ վկայություններ բարձրացրին Գաբրիել հրեշտակի դեմ՝ կուռքապաշտությունն ու սուտը առաջ մղելու համար █
Հայտնություն 13:18-ը շատ հստակ ասում է.
«Այստեղ է իմաստությունը։ Ով ունի հասկացողություն, թող հաշվարկի գազանի թիվը, որովհետև դա մարդու թիվ է, և նրա թիվը 666 է»։
Հիմա համեմատիր սա Դանիել 12:10-ի հետ.
«Խոհեմները կհասկանան, բայց չարերը չեն հասկանա»։
Եվ Առակներ 28:5-ի հետ.
«Չար մարդիկ չեն հասկանում դատաստանը, բայց նրանք, ովքեր Աստծուն են որոնում, հասկանում են այն»։
Կապը ուղիղ է. չարը չի հասկանում, խոհեմը հասկանում է։ Ուստի, եթե գազանը կարող է ճանաչվել միայն նրա կողմից, ով ունի հասկացողություն, իսկ չարը չի հասկանում, ապա գազանը չի կարող լինել խոհեմը. գազանը չարն է։
Եվ այստեղ գալիս է վերջին հարցը. եթե չարը հալածել է արդար պատգամը, չի խնդրել դարձի գալ և չի դարձի եկել, ապա ինչպե՞ս կարող էր հավատարմորեն պահպանել այն, ինչ հալածել է։ Եթե սկզբնական պատգամը արդարություն էր արդարի համար, բայց դատապարտություն՝ չարի համար, ապա ո՞վ ուներ այն փոխելու շահը։ Մտածիր։
Գազանի պատկերը, ուրեմն, հալածողի կուռքն է։ Արձանը, այն պատկերը, որի առաջ անաստվածը ծնկի է գալիս աղոթելու համար, այն անաստվածը, ով զայրանում է նրա վրա, ով ասում է.
«Ահա այստեղ, Ելից 20:5-ում, սա արգելված է»։
Մի խնդրիր ինձ դա անել քեզ հետ։ Եթե պնդում ես այդ պատկերին երկրպագել, արա դա առանց ինձ։
Այն Հռոմը, որը հալածեց Հիսուսին, աղոթում էր իր բազմաթիվ աստվածների ու աստվածուհիների արձաններին, ինչպես Մարսին և Յուպիտերին։ Այսօր նույն կերպարներն ենք տեսնում նրանց արձաններում. միայն անուններն են փոխված։ Նայիր, օրինակ, նրան, ում կոչում են «Սուրբ Միքայել հրեշտակապետ». իրականում նա հռոմեական հալածող է, որին երկրպագում են՝ նրանց աստված Մարսը։ Իսկ երկար մազերով կերպարը անկասկած Զևսն է կամ վերանվանված Յուպիտերը։
Զևսի երկրպագուները խոզի միս էին ուտում, բայց Հռոմը թույլ է տալիս դա՝ հենվելով Մատթեոս 15:11-ի և Ա Տիմոթեոս 4:1–6-ի վրա։ Սակայն ըստ Մատթեոս 5:17–18-ի՝ Հիսուսը չի եկել օրենքը կամ մարգարեությունները վերացնելու համար։ Երկրորդ Օրինաց 14-ը օրենք է և արգելում է խոզի միս ուտելը, իսկ Եսային մարգարե է, և նրա մարգարեությունը դատապարտում է խոզի միս ուտելը Եսայիա 65-ում։ Եթե Հռոմը չի հարգել օրենքը, ապա նաև խեղաթյուրել է այն. ուստի անիմաստ է պաշտպանել ամբողջ Հին Կտակարանը՝ բացի արդարից։ Արդար մեղադրանքը նույնը չէ, ինչ զրպարտությունը։
Հայտնություն 12:10-ը խոսում է մեր եղբայրների մեղադրողի մասին, այսինքն՝ նրանց, ովքեր զրպարտում են նրանց։ Նրանց զրպարտությունները չեն սահմանափակվում սրբերին անարդար և կուռքապաշտությանը նպաստող պատգամներ վերագրելով, այլ նաև զրպարտություններով պատկերների միջոցով, որոնք վերագրվել են նրանց և վերաբերվել են որպես կուռքերի՝ պատկերներ, որոնք սրբերը կհամարեին վիրավորական։
Հելլենիստական, սրբերին օտար պատկերների միջոցով նրանք կեղծ վկայություն տվեցին Աստծու մարդկանց մարմնական տեսքի և արական բնույթի մասին. նրանք վիրավորեցին նրանց, ինչպես Սոդոմում վիրավորվեցին Ղոտը և արդար հրեշտակները (տես Ծննդոց 19:5–13, Հայտնություն 13:6)։
Ա Կորնթացիս 11:1–14-ը ցույց է տալիս, որ տղամարդու համար ամոթ է երկար մազեր կրելը, իսկ ազգերի դատաստանը Մատթեոս 25:31–46-ում հերքում է անխտիր համընդհանուր սիրո վարդապետությունը։
Հայտնություն 12:9–12-ը հաստատում է, որ Վիշապը խաբում է ամբողջ աշխարհին և պարտվելու է դատաստանի ժամանակ, որը կկատարվի սրբերի վկայության միջոցով։ Ըստ Հայտնություն 20:3–6-ի՝ նրանք իրենց նախորդ կյանքերում հավատարիմ են եղել Աստծուն, հրաժարվել են կուռքերին երկրպագելուց, նույնիսկ եթե դրա համար ստիպված են եղել մահանալ գազանի (անարդարի) ձեռքով, որը պահանջում էր, որ «գազանի պատկերը» երկրպագվի։
Դոգման հավատ է, որը պարտադրվում է որպես անկասկածելի։ Ինստիտուցիոնալ կրոնները ընդունումը սահմանում են որպես ուղղափառություն, իսկ քննադատությունը՝ որպես հերետիկոսություն։ Թեև նրանց դոգմաները փոխադարձաբար հակասում են միմյանց, նրանց առաջնորդները պնդում են, թե «բոլոր ճանապարհները տանում են դեպի Աստված»։ Այդ պնդումը բացահայտում է նրանց. եթե դոգմաները հակասում են, ապա այդ ճանապարհները չեն կարող ճշմարիտ լինել։ Դոգմաները հակասում են. երկու ճշմարտություն երբեք չեն հակասում, այլ լրացնում են միմյանց։
Այստեղ ցույց է տրվում, թե ինչպես Վիշապի անունով հռոմեական հալածողները մեղադրեցին «մեր եղբայրներին», ներառյալ հավատարիմ պատգամաբերներին, ինչպես Գաբրիելը, իբր արդարությանը հակասող պատգամներ փոխանցելու մեջ։
ԸՆԴՀԱՆՈՒՐ ԴՈԳՄԱՆ (Քրիստոնեություն և Իսլամ). հավերժական կույսությունը։
Քրիստոնեությունն ու իսլամը պնդում են, որ Գաբրիելը հայտարարել է Հիսուսի կուսական ծնունդը՝ Եսայիայի մարգարեությունը կատարելու համար (Մատթեոս 1 / Ղուրան 19)։ Սակայն Եսայիա 7:14–16-ը չի խոսում Հիսուսի մասին և չի հիշատակում «հավերժական կույսություն»։ Նշանը տրվել է Աքազ թագավորին և պետք է անմիջապես կատարվեր՝ մինչև երեխան կարողանար տարբերել բարին չարից։
Եսային խոսում է երիտասարդ կնոջ մասին, ոչ թե մի կնոջ, ով ծննդաբերությունից հետո կշարունակեր մնալ կույս։ Կատարումը տեղի է ունենում Եզեկիայի միջոցով՝ Աքազի ժամանակների հավատարիմ թագավորի.
- Քանդում է պղնձե օձը (Դ Թագավորներ 18:4–7)
- Աստված նրա հետ էր (Էմանուել)
- Ասորիների պարտությունը, որը մարգարեացել էր Եսային (Դ Թագավորներ 19:35–37)
Հավերժական կուսական ծնունդը, որը կիսում են քրիստոնեությունն ու իսլամը, չի բխում Եսայից, այլ ավելի ուշ Հռոմի կողմից պարտադրված վերաիմաստավորումից։
Այս հակասությունները Աստծուց չեն գալիս։ Դրանք գալիս են Հռոմից։ Տիրակալական կայսրությունը չէր ցանկանում ժողովուրդներ, որոնք կպահանջեին իրենց արժանապատվության հարգումը, այլ ժողովուրդներ՝ ծնկի եկած։ Խոնարհվել խորհրդանիշների առաջ նշանակում է խոնարհվել նրանց առաջ, ովքեր դրանք պարտադրում են։
Հայտնություն 12:9
«Եվ դուրս գցվեց մեծ վիշապը, նա, ով խաբում է ամբողջ աշխարհին. նա գցվեց երկրի վրա, և նրա հրեշտակներն էլ նրա հետ գցվեցին»։
Հայտնություն 12:12
«Ուստի ուրախացեք, երկինքներ, և դուք, որ բնակվում եք նրանցում (տես Սաղմոսներ 110:1–3, 118:17–20, Օսեե 6:2, Սաղմոսներ 90:4, 91:7)։ Վա՜յ երկրին և ծովին, որովհետև սատանան մեծ զայրույթով իջել է ձեզ մոտ՝ իմանալով, որ քիչ ժամանակ ունի» (տես Դանիել 8:25, Դանիել 12:10)։

Her Eye That Sees All Over Lima? Remote Vision or Just Jealousy? (Video language: English) https://youtu.be/YW9V–03ADA
The weeping and gnashing of teeth of the wicked at the time of judgment – Matthew 13:50, Psalm 112:10 (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/-stdt4fKL28
https://shewillfindme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/idi02-judgment-against-babylon-english.pdf .»
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: “I will take vengeance on My enemies!”
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called “love for the enemy” that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.
Rome invented lies to protect criminals and destroy God’s justice. “From the traitor Judas to the convert Paul”
I thought they were doing witchcraft on her, but she was the witch. These are my arguments. ( https://eltrabajodegabriel.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/idi02-the-religion-i-defend-is-named-justice.pdf
) –
Is that all your power, wicked witch?
Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. █
Night was falling on the main road.
A blanket of darkness covered the winding path that wound through the mountains.
He did not walk aimlessly.
His goal was freedom, but the journey had only just begun.
With his body numb from the cold and his stomach empty for days,
he had no company but the elongated shadow cast by the headlights of the trucks that roared beside him,
advancing without stopping, indifferent to his presence.
Every step was a challenge,
every curve a new trap from which he had to emerge unscathed.
For seven nights and mornings,
he was forced to advance along the thin yellow line of a narrow road with just two lanes,
while trucks, buses and trailers whizzed by just inches from his body.
In the darkness, the deafening roar of engines enveloped him,
and the lights of trucks coming from behind cast their glow on the mountain in front of him.
At the same time, other trucks approached in the opposite direction,
forcing him to decide in fractions of a second
whether to pick up the pace or remain still in his precarious crossing,
where every movement meant the difference between life and death.
Hunger was a beast that devoured him from the inside,
but the cold was no less merciless.
In the sierra, the early hours of the morning were invisible claws that penetrated to the bones.
The wind enveloped him with its icy breath,
as if it wanted to extinguish the last spark of life that remained to him.
He took refuge where he could,
sometimes under a bridge,
other times in a corner of concrete that offered him a minimum of shelter.
But the rain was unforgiving.
Water seeped into his torn clothes,
sticking to his skin and stealing what little warmth he still had.
The trucks continued their march,
and he, stubbornly hoping that someone would feel sorry,
raised his hand, waiting for a gesture of humanity.
But the drivers drove on.
Some with looks of contempt,
others simply ignoring him, as if he were a ghost.
Every now and then, a compassionate soul would stop and offer him a quick ride,
but they were few.
Most saw him as a nuisance,
a shadow on the road,
someone not worth helping.
On one of those endless nights,
desperation drove him to search for food among the scraps left by travelers.
He was not ashamed to admit it:
he fought for food with pigeons,
snatching pieces of hardened biscuits before they could make them disappear.
It was an unequal fight,
but he was determined:
he was not willing to kneel before any image,
nor to accept any man as ‘only lord and savior’.
He was not willing to please those sinister individuals
who had already kidnapped him three times over religious differences,
who with their slanders had led him to walk that yellow line.
At another time, a kind man offered him a piece of bread and a drink.
A small gesture,
but in his pain,
that kindness was a balm.
But indifference was the norm.
When he asked for help,
many would walk away,
as if they feared that his misery was contagious.
Sometimes, a simple ‘no’ was enough to extinguish all hope,
but on other occasions, contempt was reflected in cold words or empty looks.
He didn’t understand how they could ignore someone who could barely stand,
how they could watch a man collapse without batting an eyelid.
And yet, he kept going.
Not because he had the strength,
but because he had no other choice.
He continued down the road,
leaving behind him miles of asphalt,
nights without rest and days without food.
Adversity hit him with everything it had,
but he resisted.
Because deep down,
even in the most absolute desperation,
the spark of survival still burned within him,
fueled by the desire for freedom and justice.
Psalm 118:17
‘I will not die, but I will live to proclaim the works of the Lord.
18 The Lord has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death.’
Psalm 41:4
‘I said, ‘Lord, have mercy on me
and heal me, for I confess with repentance that I have sinned against You.’’
Job 33:24-25
‘God will have mercy on him and say, ‘Deliver him from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom;
25 his flesh shall become fresher than in childhood, and he shall return to the days of his youth.’’
Psalm 16:8
‘I have set the Lord always before me;
because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken.’
Psalm 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in Your presence, there is fullness of joy;
at Your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.’
Psalm 41:11-12
‘By this, I will know that You are pleased with me:
if my enemy does not triumph over me.
12 As for me, You uphold me in my integrity
and set me in Your presence forever.’
Revelation 11:4
‘These witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.’
Isaiah 11:2
‘The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him:
the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord.’
________________________________________
I made the mistake of defending the faith in the Bible, but out of ignorance. However, now I see that it is not the guiding book of the religion that Rome persecuted, but of the one it created to please itself with celibacy. That’s why they preached a Christ who doesn’t marry a woman, but rather His church, and angels who, despite having male names, do not look like men (draw your own conclusions). These figures are akin to the false saints—plaster-statue kissers—and similar to the Greco-Roman gods because, in fact, they are the same pagan gods under different names.
What they preach is a message incompatible with the interests of true saints. Therefore, this is my penance for that unintentional sin. By denying one false religion, I deny them all. And when I finish doing my penance, then God will forgive me and bless me with her, with that special woman I need. Because, although I don’t believe in the entire Bible, I do believe in what seems right and consistent to me within it; the rest is slander from the Romans.
Proverbs 28:13
‘He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy from the Lord.’
Proverbs 18:22
‘He who finds a wife finds a treasure and receives favor from the Lord.’
I seek the Lord’s favor incarnated in that special woman. She must be as the Lord commands me to be. If this upsets you, it’s because you have lost:
Leviticus 21:14
‘A widow, or a divorced woman, or a defiled woman, or a prostitute, he shall not marry these, but he shall marry a virgin from his own people.’
To me, she is glory:
1 Corinthians 11:7
‘Woman is the glory of man.’
Glory is victory, and I will find it with the power of light. Therefore, even though I don’t know her yet, I have named her: Light Victory.
And I nicknamed my web pages ‘UFOs’ because they travel at the speed of light, reaching corners of the world and shooting out rays of truth that strike down the slanderers. With the help of my web pages, I will find her, and she will find me.
When she finds me and I find her, I will tell her this:
‘You have no idea how many programming algorithms I had to devise to find you. You can’t imagine all the difficulties and adversaries I faced to find you, my Light of Victory.
I faced death itself many times:
Even a witch pretended to be you. Imagine, she told me she was the light, despite her slanderous behavior. She slandered me like no one else, but I defended myself like no one else to find you. You are a being of light; that’s why we were made for each other!
Now let’s get out of this damn place…
So this is my story. I know she will understand me, and so will the righteous.
This is what I did at the end of 2005, when I was 30 years old.
https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/themes-phrases-24languages.xlsx
Haz clic para acceder a gemini-and-i-speak-about-my-history-and-my-righteous-claims-idi02.pdf
Haz clic para acceder a gemini-y-yo-hablamos-de-mi-historia-y-mis-reclamos-de-justicia-idi01.pdf
Daniel 12 – Jehovah thank you for teaching me not to trust in myself, but in you. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/gY2XMJB13SU
1 The Age of the Internet: the age of revelations, of automatic translations, and of judgment-time tools with global reach. https://eltestimoniodegabriel.link/2025/05/24/the-age-of-the-internet-the-age-of-revelations-of-automatic-translations-and-of-doomsday-tools-with-global-reach/ 2 Pakaian serigala dalam domba berkata: Ada lebih banyak sukacita di surga atas satu serigala yang menjadi domba daripada lebih dari sembilan puluh sembilan domba yang tersesat dan tidak perlu dipandu. Ini adalah firman Kekaisaran Serigala, saya katakan, itu adalah Firman Tuhan. , Indonesian , #LQIMA https://gabriels.work/2025/01/24/pakaian-serigala-dalam-domba-berkata-ada-lebih-banyak-sukacita-di-surga-atas-satu-serigala-yang-menjadi-domba-daripada-lebih-dari-sembilan-puluh-sembilan-domba-yang-tersesat-dan-tidak-perlu-dipandu/ 3 ¿No eres tú el Diablo al exigir la adoración que el Diablo pediría siendo que tú tampoco eres Dios?. https://gabriels.work/2024/09/20/no-eres-tu-el-diablo-al-exigir-la-adoracion-que-el-diablo-pediria-siendo-que-tu-tampoco-eres-dios/ 4 Estadísticas desconcertantes: ¿Y si no hubiese nacido en Perú sino en otro país hispano?, ¿Y si esta campaña que hice en Lima, la hubiese hecho en La Paz, Tegucigalpa, Managua, Santiago, Buenos Aires, Quito, Bogota, Caracás, Montevideo, Ciudad de Guatemala, San Salvador, México DF o ciudad de Panamá?, ¿Por qué tuvo que ser precisamente aquí en Lima?. https://ovni03.blogspot.com/2024/01/estadisticas-desconcertantes-y-si-no.html 5 Veamos pues la verdadera caída del imperio romano a manos de un ejército pequeño en número de soldados, a una proporción jamás vista, y que jamás se volverá a ver, ¿no han visto como me he tenido que clonar?, ¿dónde están mis compañeros de batalla?. https://ovni03.blogspot.com/2023/07/veamos-pues-la-verdadera-caida-del.html

«The Idol of Babylon: Rome’s false virgin amidst the Middle East conflict and the false religions that divide good people. In the 21st century, as the world watches in horror at the brutality of the conflict between Israel and Hamas, an uncomfortable truth becomes clear: both sides hide behind institutionalized religions to justify injustices at the cost of innocent blood. It is not God who endorses these wars. It is not divinity who signs the missiles. What lies behind them is power with injustice, sustained by dogmas created to divide, control, and manipulate.
Leviticus 18:22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination. 23 You shall not lie with any animal to defile yourself with it, nor shall a woman give birth to a man… He gave himself to an animal to lie with it: it is perversion.
Romans 1:24 Therefore God gave them over to sexual impurity in the sinful desires of their hearts, to debase their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, worshiping and serving the created thing rather than the Creator, who is eternally praised. Amen (Exodus 20:5). 26 Therefore God gave them over to shameful lusts (Isaiah 10:15, Proverbs 16:4). Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for those that are unnatural (Leviticus 18:23). 27 In the same way, the men also, abandoning natural relations with women, burned with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error (Leviticus 18:22). 2 Peter 2:6 And if God condemned the cities of Sodom and 7 delivered righteous Lot, who was weary of seeing the horrible conduct of the unrighteous, 8 (for that righteous man living among them was vexed by his righteous soul from day to day, seeing and hearing their unrighteous deeds), 9 for God knows how to deliver the righteous from their snares and reserve the unrighteous for punishment at the time of judgment.
https://lavirgenmecreera.com/2025/05/30/el-rey-ezequias-y-la-virgen-abi-la-profecia-robada-y-manipulada-por-el-imperio-romano/
https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/idi02-the-pauline-epistles-and-the-other-lies-of-rome-in-the-bible.pdf .»
«This pattern repeats in all religions except one.
I’m going to show you how the false prophet manipulates faith with what they call ‘the gospel of prosperity’.
A message that looks spiritual, but in reality is a business: promises of miracles in exchange for money, guilt disguised as faith, and a system where the preacher always wins and the believer always loses.
Get ready, because what you’re about to read is not a common critique: here we are going to expose the entire trap.
There is a method to extract money in some religious groups, with phrases like ‘sow to reap’, where they ask for donations as seed.
ChatGPT said:
Yes, exactly. That is one of the most used tactics in certain religious circles—especially in the so-called ‘prosperity gospel.’
The trick works like this:
• They redefine the donation as a ‘spiritual seed’ that supposedly ‘God will multiply’ in the form of health, wealth, or miracles.
• They promise a guaranteed harvest, but the condition is to give first (sowing), and, conveniently, give to them.
• They shift the blame to the believer: if the ‘harvest’ never comes, it wasn’t because the promise was false, but because the donor ‘didn’t sow enough’ or ‘lacked faith.’
• The only one who always reaps is the preacher, who receives constant money.
In short: it is a business disguised as faith, a religious pyramid scheme where the only beneficiary is the one asking for the sowing.
I said:
Bot, are there similar figures to the ‘prosperity gospel’ in other religions of the world?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, José, there are. The phenomenon of the so-called ‘prosperity gospel’ (giving money or performing rituals in exchange for ‘material blessings’) is not exclusive to current Christian groups. It appears with other names and disguises in different religions and cultures of the world. Here are some clear parallels:
• Hinduism and commercial gurus: some spiritual leaders in India have built true economic empires, promising positive karma, wealth, or success in exchange for donations, ‘pujas’ (paid rituals), or belonging to their sect.
• Tibetan and Southeast Asian Buddhism: in certain places, monks sell amulets or perform costly ceremonies to attract prosperity, fortune, or health, far from the original teaching of detachment.
• Islam (popular branches): although the Qur’an criticizes greed, some religious leaders sell ‘baraka’ (blessings) or spiritual intercession in exchange for money, presenting the offering as the key to prosper.
• Traditional African religions: certain priests charge for sacrifices or rituals with the promise of business success, fertility, or riches.
• Popular Catholicism: beyond official doctrine, there is the practice of paying promises, masses, indulgences, or favors to saints to obtain miracles, protection, or prosperity.
• Judaism (popular currents): donations to rabbis or the purchase of segulot (amulets) for health, children, or success are promoted. There are also rabbis who sell personalized prayers or prosperity talismans. Material blessing is presented as a product exchangeable for money.
At the core, it is the same structure of manipulation:
They sell you the idea that ‘the divinity’ controls your material success.
The leader places himself as the exclusive mediator.
They demand economic sacrifice (money, offerings, goods) to ‘open the key’ to your blessings.
That is why it looks so similar: in all religions, when faith is corrupted, the ‘prosperity’ version appears as a business disguised as spirituality.
I said:
I want to differentiate myself from those who criticize the ‘prosperity gospel’ but still defend the Bible as if it were coherent in everything.
Many defend the Bible as if it were a single block of truth. But look: when I searched the phrase ‘do good without looking at whom’, Google showed me verses that say exactly that, like Luke 6:35: ‘Love your enemies and do good without expecting anything in return.’
But in the same Bible we find the opposite: Ecclesiasticus 12 says ‘When you do good, pay attention to whom. Helping the wicked brings no good.’
So, what do we do? Do we do good without looking at whom… or looking at whom?
Luke 6:35 But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return; and your reward shall be great, and you shall be children of the Most High; for He is kind to the unthankful and to the evil.
36 Be therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.
Versus
Ecclesiasticus 12:6 For God also hates the wicked
and will give them their punishment.
Psalms 5:4 For You are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness;
Evil shall not dwell with You.
5 The foolish shall not stand in Your sight;
You hate all workers of iniquity.
6 You shall destroy those who speak lies;
Jehovah will abhor the bloodthirsty and deceitful man.
If God loves his enemies, how can he at the same time hate and destroy the wicked?
These contradictions show that it is not a single block of truth… but a text full of opposing voices: the opposing voices of Roman persecutors against the just voices of the saints.
The false prophet: ‘God is jealous, but not if you pray to the creatures I point out to you. God is everywhere, but mysteriously he only appears when you kneel before my stone. If your miracle delays, don’t blame my promise: blame your lack of faith and your offering too small. The tears of the statue are proof of divine power… let the donations not stop.’
This is how the false prophet sells you ‘the gospel of prosperity’: ‘Do you want your miracle? Don’t kneel before a statue, kneel with your money at my altar.’
Now you have seen it: the false prophet always promises prosperity, but the only real prosperity is his own. Do not be seduced by his sweet words or his shows of manufactured miracles. Remember: truth is not for sale, and justice cannot be bought.
El evangelio de la prosperidad… Este patrón se repite en todas las religiones excepto una.
The gospel of prosperity… This pattern repeats in all religions except one.https://shewillfindme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/idi02-judgment-against-babylon-english.pdf .» «The religion I defend is named justice. █ I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say. The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’ 📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
El propósito de Dios no es el propósito de Roma. Las religiones de Roma conducen a sus propios intereses y no al favor de Dios.
Haz clic para acceder a idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.pdf
https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.docx She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me. ( https://ellameencontrara.com – https://lavirgenmecreera.com – https://shewillfind.me ) This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible: Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army. Psalm 2:2-4 ‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying: ‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’ Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them. The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down: Isaiah 2:8-11 8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. 9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them. 10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty. 11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day. Proverbs 19:14 House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife. Revelation 1:6 And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. 1 Corinthians 11:7 The woman is the glory of man. What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army? The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army. Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.Un duro golpe de realidad es a “Babilonia” la “resurrección” de los justos, que es a su vez la reencarnación de Israel en el tercer milenio: La verdad no destruye a todos, la verdad no duele a todos, la verdad no incomoda a todos: Israel, la verdad, nada más que la verdad, la verdad que duele, la verdad que incomoda, verdades que duelen, verdades que atormentan, verdades que destruyen.This is my story: José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://lavirgenmecreera.com,
https://ovni03.blogspot.com, and other blogs.
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old. At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: ovni03.blogspot.com and in this video:
Haz clic para acceder a ten-piedad-de-mi-yahve-mi-dios.pdf
The day I almost committed suicide on the Villena Bridge (Miraflores, Lima) because of religious persecution and the side effects of the drugs I was forced to consume: Year 2001, age: 26 years.
»
Number of days of purification: Day # 35 https://144k.xyz/2025/12/15/i-decided-to-exclude-pork-seafood-and-insects-from-my-diet-the-modern-system-reintroduces-them-without-warning/
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .DOCX you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/math21-progam-code-in-turbo-pascal-bestiadn-dot-com.pdf
If z+88=57 then z=-31
An welche Religion glaubte Jesus?: Die Religion Jesu war „Der Weg“. Die Religion Jesu war weder das Christentum noch das Judentum noch der Islam. Mein nicht-katholisches Glaubensbekenntnis: Ich glaube, dass Christus im dritten Jahrtausend wiedergeboren wird, um zur Rechten Gottes zu sitzen, und von dort aus wird er richten und einige am Leben und andere tot lassen. https://ellameencontrara.com/2024/12/18/die-religion-jesu-war-der-weg-die-religion-jesu-war-weder-das-christentum-noch-das-judentum-noch-der-islam-mein-nicht-katholisches-glaubensbekenntnis-ich-glaube-dass-christus-im/
Nilitoka naye bila kujua alikuwa mhubiri wa injili ambaye alitaka kunipa mahubiri. Tarehe haikuisha vizuri. https://144k.xyz/2025/03/26/nilitoka-naye-bila-kujua-alikuwa-mhubiri-wa-injili-ambaye-alitaka-kunipa-mahubiri-tarehe-haikuisha-vizuri/
It does not pass the reasoning test. Word of Satan: ‘Love your enemies, bless those who curse you… and love the wolves, for only then can they devour the sheep without resistance.’ Whoever needs to hide brilliant ideas has already lost the debate with the wise.»

















































