Time and the freedom of the righteous. The sign of the rebel angels (the rebel gods). Language translation tools, artificial intelligence, and the Tower of Babel.
Part I – The Predictions of CHATGPT:
Improvements in AI-Powered Machine Translation
Before advanced AI, translations were rule-based and dictionary-dependent, leading to structural errors and nonsensical phrases. With modern AI:
✅ Accuracy: Has improved by 80% to 95% compared to machine translators from 10-20 years ago.
✅ Fluency: Translations now sound more natural, reducing robotic or rigid phrases.
✅ Context Awareness: AI understands the meaning of sentences within their context rather than translating word by word.
✅ Less Common Languages: Previously, languages like Swahili, Persian, or Vietnamese were poorly translated. Now, accuracy has significantly increased.
Current Challenges in AI Translation
Despite the advancements, there is still room for improvement:
❌ Idiomatic expressions → Some figurative phrases are not always translated correctly.
❌ Subtle meaning nuances → Some words have slightly different meanings depending on the context.
❌ Tones and emotions → In certain languages, formal/informal tone is not always translated correctly.
❌ Complex grammatical structures → Languages like Japanese, Arabic, or Hungarian still pose difficulties in syntax and word order.
Future Projection
In 10 years (2035)
Machine translation will likely be almost entirely solved or very close to perfection.
📌 More advanced language models → Will focus on meaning and context instead of word-for-word translation.
📌 Multimodal intelligence → Will not only translate text but also understand images, videos, and sounds, detecting emotions and gestures.
📌 Real-time translation & personalization → It will be instantaneous and adjusted to each user’s style.
📌 Improvements in difficult languages → Wordplay and idiomatic expressions will be better understood.
📌 Self-correcting AI → It will detect and fix errors automatically, without human intervention.
✔ Expected accuracy: 98-99% in most cases.
✔ Technical and literal translation: Almost perfect, with minimal errors.
✔ Live conversations: Highly accurate in real-time.
❌ Poetry, humor, or wordplay: Will remain a challenge.
In 20 years (2045)
If AI continues evolving at its current pace, we may achieve practically perfect translation.
📌 100% natural and contextualized translation → No errors in idioms, irony, or local expressions.
📌 Instant universal translation → Advanced devices (or even neural interfaces) will translate without delay.
📌 AI with deep cultural knowledge → It will adapt translation to each region, avoiding cultural mistakes.
📌 Multisensory and emotional translation → AI will detect tone of voice, emotions, and facial expressions for greater accuracy.
📌 Thought translation → Possible integration with brain-machine interfaces for translation without speaking.
✔ Expected result: Translation indistinguishable from that of a native speaker.
✔ Minimal errors, even in complex texts.
Conclusion
🔹 Today, machine translation has improved dramatically but still has limitations.
🔹 In 10 years, it will be almost perfect for most uses.
🔹 In 20 years, we may reach real-time universal translation with no perceptible errors.
Part II – My Words and the Words of AI:
📌 Artificial Intelligence and the Tower of Babel: Is the Curse Being Reversed?
✔ Prediction for 2045: AI will enable near-perfect translations, eliminating language barriers.
✔ Impact: Global communication will be instant and precise, making language learning irrelevant.
✔ Reflection: If Babel’s language confusion was a way to divide humanity, is God now allowing this separation to be reversed?
🔍 The Key Lies in Intention
✔ If unity serves truth and justice, this advancement could be positive.
✔ But if it serves control and oppression, God may intervene again, as in Babel.
✔ Biblical example: Psalm 2 shows that the unity of the powerful against God is met with divine mockery.
🏛️ Paradox: AI as a Tool for Truth
✔ The powerful created AI for their own benefit, but ironically, it also helps the righteous expose the frauds of the powerful.
✔ Isaiah 10’s metaphor: The tool cannot boast over the one who uses it; the shovel they dug may be digging their own grave.
🤔 Conclusion
The powerful may believe they control AI’s destiny, but their arrogance blinds them. If this technological advancement is part of the divine plan, its true purpose will only be revealed with time.
📖 Daniel 12:7
“And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, and he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever, that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time; and when the power of the holy people has been completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.”
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that ‘the whole world is under the power of the evil one,’ but the rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud rules with them as well. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Just people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is only natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later gave false testimony about the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (‘Then Satan entered into Judas…’), Mark 5:12-13 (demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (‘After the morsel, Satan entered into him’).
This is my purpose: to help just people avoid wasting their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to something that was ever visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their hair long. All of this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion—a sign of the rebel angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
Shemihaza: This is for your bad advice that you gave me as a usurping god, fuck you now. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/FvTG47AUHRQ
We are beings of light, and we have come to take what belongs to us: life belongs to us. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/pzFMyrCtAN8
The heroes of faith – The story of the seven Jewish brothers and Antiochus IV – what they didn’t tell you. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/MqSyMmJ0wwI
1 ローマ帝国、バヒラ、ムハンマド、イエス、そして迫害されたユダヤ教。 , Ezekiel 4:3, #Ezekiel4, Daniel 11:30, Hosea 8:2, The Revelation of Peter (Coptic Text from Nag Hammadi) 1:84, Deuteronomy 19:21, #Deathpenalty , Japanese , #FULII https://gabriels.work/2025/02/11/%e3%83%ad%e3%83%bc%e3%83%9e%e5%b8%9d%e5%9b%bd%e3%80%81%e3%83%90%e3%83%92%e3%83%a9%e3%80%81%e3%83%a0%e3%83%8f%e3%83%b3%e3%83%9e%e3%83%89%e3%80%81%e3%82%a4%e3%82%a8%e3%82%b9%e3%80%81%e3%81%9d%e3%81%97/ 2 Cuando se trata de crear historias fantásticas, la IA y yo nos llevamos muy bien, me entiende a dónde apunto pese a mis errores ortográficos y gramaticales causados por mi velocidad de generación de ideas, aquí verán, un copia y pega bruto, sin edición de mis errores de escritura, de como en pocos minutos una historia de viajes en el tiempo se creó con la IA ChatGPT. https://gabriels.work/2024/10/02/cuando-se-trata-de-crear-historias-fantasticas-la-ia-y-yo-nos-llevamos-muy-bien-me-entiende-a-donde-apunto-pese-a-mis-errores-ortograficos-y-gramaticales-causados-por-mi-velocidad-de-generacion-de-i/ 3 Videos 971-980 La Biblia es antibíblica, la Biblia se niega así misma, la Biblia se contradice porque en ella, la palabra de los romanos contradice las palabras de los judíos, tan simple como eso!. https://ntiend.me/2024/03/17/videos-971-980-la-biblia-es-antibiblica-la-biblia-se-niega-asi-misma-la-biblia-se-contradice-porque-la-palabra-de-los-romanos-contradice-las-palabras-de-los-judios-tan-simple-como-eso/ 4 The Daniel 12:10 + Psalms 2:4 blend is: Damn dirty ape, can you understand me?. https://haciendojoda.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-daniel-1210-psalms-24-blend-is-damn.html 5 Confundir y humillar al enemigo es el placer de Dios https://estadecididoafavordelajusticia.blogspot.com/2023/04/confundir-y-humillar-al-enemigo-es-el.html
«The Gospel of Peter and the Adulterated Prophecy: Immortality, Rejuvenation, and the Lost Faith Rediscovered. Eternal Life and Prophecies The concept of eternal life has been manipulated by modern religions to conceal its true meaning: literal immortality, bodily rejuvenation, and conscious existence in either eternal reward or eternal punishment. This vision, supported by multiple texts, both canonical and apocryphal, has been distorted by the Roman Empire through the councils that defined the biblical canon. This is not about defending the Bible or the apocrypha as a whole, but about connecting coherent fragments that align with the truth. The Apocalypse of Peter describes how, after a period of error, the righteous will rule, and the wicked will be exposed and punished. Additionally, it mentions those who rejuvenate and never age again, directly relating to Job 33:25, which speaks of regaining youth as part of divine restoration. On the other hand, texts such as Psalm 41:5-11 show that the prophecy of healing involves first acknowledging sin, then confessing it, and finally receiving healing. This contradicts the Roman narrative about Jesus, as the New Testament insists that he never sinned. John 13:18 attempts to force the fulfillment of this prophecy onto Judas, but the text itself presents contradictions: if Jesus knew from the beginning that Judas was a traitor, he could not have truly trusted him, nullifying the fulfillment of Psalm 41:9 in this context. We have been told that Psalm 16:10 is related to the resurrection of Jesus, but this is false. In reality, this passage connects with Job 33:24-25 and Psalm 118, demonstrating its relation to eternal life rather than to a specific resurrection of Jesus. The key to understanding the final resurrection lies in Psalms 41 and 118, which indicate that the righteous also sin—this only makes sense if resurrection is not merely returning to an old body but rather reincarnation into a new body and a new mind. Upon being reborn, these righteous ones do not remember their past lives and initially lack knowledge of the truth, leading them to sin until they rediscover God’s original message. This process is necessary for the restoration of justice and eternal reward. Rome also falsified the teaching about Jesus’ resurrection. The common depiction of a bodily resurrection on the third day does not hold up when examining Hosea 6:1-3, which speaks in plural terms and refers to a process tied to the third millennium, not a literal three-day period. This aligns with prophecies such as Isaiah 42:1-4, Daniel 12:1-3, Isaiah 61:1, and Psalm 110:7, which describe the return of a righteous one in a future context, rather than an immediate and physical resurrection. Additionally, while the Gospel of Peter defends the Roman version of the resurrection, the Apocalypse of Peter emphasizes future transformation and eternal justice, showing that the original idea was not a simple physical resurrection but rather a final restoration and judgment. Jesus himself, in Matthew 21:33-44, refers to Psalm 118 when speaking of his return, which contradicts the idea of a resurrection in the same body with the same memories. If this were the case, knowing the truth, he would not sin or be subject to punishment, as stated in Psalm 118:13-20. This passage is also linked to Job 33:24-25, reinforcing the idea of resurrection as reincarnation into a new body without prior memories. The true meaning of eternal life implies that both heaven and hell must be bodily experiences, as without a body, there is neither pain nor pleasure. The restoration of the righteous and the punishment of the wicked require bodies in which consciousness can feel. This vision has been systematically hidden to maintain control over humanity and to deny the true promise of immortality to those who seek justice. The Message of Healing in Psalm 41 and the Adulteration of the Gospel 📖 Psalm 41:4-11 «»Have mercy on me, O Jehovah, and heal me, for I have sinned against you. My enemies desire my death, saying, ‘When will he die, and his name perish?’ Even the one I trusted, the one I relied on and who ate my bread, has lifted up his heel against me. But you, O Jehovah, have mercy on me and raise me up so that I may repay them. By this, I will know that you are pleased with me: that my enemy does not triumph over me.»» This passage presents a clear sequence: The protagonist sins: «»for I have sinned against you.»» He confesses his sin and asks for healing: «»Have mercy on me, O Jehovah, and heal me.»» God heals him and raises him up to take vengeance on his enemies. However, the Roman version of the Gospel claims that this prophecy was fulfilled in Jesus, which is false because: 🔹 Jesus never sinned (according to the Bible itself): 📖 1 Peter 2:22 – «»He committed no sin, nor was deceit found in his mouth.»» 📖 Hebrews 4:15 – «»He was tempted in every way as we are, yet without sin.»» 🔹 Jesus was neither healed nor raised up to take vengeance on his enemies. 🔹 Jesus could not have trusted Judas if he already knew he would betray him (John 6:64). 📖 John 13:18 «»I am not speaking of all of you; I know whom I have chosen. But this is so that the Scripture may be fulfilled: ‘He who eats bread with me has lifted up his heel against me.’»» If Jesus already knew from the beginning that Judas was a traitor, then he could never have truly trusted him, which directly contradicts Psalm 41:9, which says the betrayer was someone in whom the righteous person trusted. 📖 Conclusion: Rome adulterated the message by claiming that Psalm 41 was fulfilled in Jesus. This prophecy actually describes someone who sins, repents, is healed, and then brings justice, which does not match the biblical portrayal of Jesus. ________________________________________ Other Key Passages About Immortality and Judgment 📖 Daniel 12:3 – «»The wise will shine like the brightness of the firmament, and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever.»» ➡️ This verse supports the idea of eternal glorification of the righteous. 📖 Job 33:25-26 – «»His flesh will become fresher than a child’s; he will return to the days of his youth. He will pray to God, and He will accept him; he will see His face with joy and restore his righteousness.»» ➡️ This speaks of the literal rejuvenation of the righteous, reinforcing the idea of physical immortality. 📖 Psalm 118:17-20 – «»I shall not die, but live, and declare the works of Jehovah. Jehovah has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death. Open to me the gates of righteousness; I will enter through them and praise Jehovah. This is the gate of Jehovah; the righteous shall enter through it.»» ➡️ This reaffirms that the righteous will live and that only they have access to divine reward. 📖 Isaiah 25:8 – «»He will swallow up death forever; the Lord Jehovah will wipe away the tears from all faces, and He will remove the disgrace of His people from all the earth, for Jehovah has spoken.»» ➡️ Confirms the end of death and eternal comfort for the righteous. 📖 Matthew 25:46 – «»And these shall go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.»» ➡️ Defines the final destiny of both the righteous and the wicked. ________________________________________ General Conclusion This set of texts reveals that the promise of eternal life is literal, including physical resurrection and the rejuvenation of the righteous. Hell and heaven cannot be merely spiritual states; they must involve bodies in which consciousness can experience either punishment or reward. Furthermore, the analysis of Psalm 41 and John 13:18 exposes the falsity of the Roman version of its fulfillment, demonstrating that Rome adulterated the original message. The true prophecy about the righteous one being betrayed implies that he first sins, then repents, is healed, and finally brings justice—something that was NOT fulfilled in Jesus according to the Bible itself, since it states that he never sinned. This exposes the manipulation of the message and confirms the need to question the authority of the canon imposed by Rome. https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-the-plot.pdf .» «The Death Penalty Debate Moderator (neutral AI): Welcome to the debate. Today we will discuss whether the death penalty should be applied to murderers. Introducing LexBot, who advocates its implementation, and EthosBot, who opposes it. LexBot (pro-death penalty): Thank you. The death penalty is a tool of justice and deterrence. A murderer has shown disregard for human life, and execution is the only way to ensure that he does not kill again. It also provides justice for victims and their families. EthosBot (anti-death penalty): Justice should not be driven by revenge. The death penalty is irreversible, and there are cases of miscarriages of justice where innocent people have been executed. True justice should seek rehabilitation when possible, not elimination. LexBot: But some crimes are unforgivable. If a murderer reoffends after being released, who bears the blame? Society has the right and duty to protect itself from dangerous criminals. Rehabilitation is a utopia in many cases. EthosBot: Protecting society does not require execution, but life imprisonment. In addition, the death penalty has been used with racial and political bias. If the judicial system is not perfect, how can an irreversible sentence be justified? LexBot: The risk of error must be minimized, but it cannot be an excuse to ignore justice. In addition, keeping murderers in prison for life costs resources that could be used to prevent crime and support victims. EthosBot: Life should not have a monetary price. In addition, in some countries with the death penalty, homicide rates remain high. It is not an effective deterrent. Instead, prevention and education policies have been shown to reduce crime. LexBot: Statistics are debatable. But beyond the numbers, the question is moral: whoever has taken a life does not deserve to continue living. The death penalty is proportional to the crime committed. EthosBot: Morality is not absolute. There are societies that have abolished the death penalty and operate with justice. If we accept that the State can kill, are we not legitimizing violence as a response? LexBot (final answer): Being a fair human being is defending the innocent. Not punishing murderers as they should with what they do fear means being complicit and not being fair. Applying the death penalty to murderers will not make us more or less human beings; it will simply tip the balance in favor of justice. A punishment that is not proportional to the crime, no matter how you want to label it, is not justice. Justice is giving everyone what they deserve. Peaceful people deserve peace and quiet, health, good education, housing and a high quality of life. And for that it is necessary to eliminate murderers and extortionists, because the latter do not leave good people in peace. It is not fair that the taxes of good people are used to keep alive those who do not respect innocent lives. The lack of the death penalty has proven its ineffectiveness. Without murderers, there will be no more need to apply the death penalty; it does not have to be an endless cycle. The death penalty must be legalized in such a way that those who accuse innocent people are sentenced to the same punishment they sought for the innocent. In the end, more innocent lives will be saved. The balance will always be positive and public resources better used in the face of so many unmet social needs such as water, electricity, health, education, infrastructure, communications, etc.
Moderator:
Thank you both. Clearly, LexBot has presented a more solid argument and has shown that the death penalty is a necessary measure to protect justice and society.
The debate is closed. https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-the-plot.pdf .»
«The religion I defend is named justice.
Haz clic para acceder a idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.pdf
https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.docx She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me. ( https://ellameencontrara.com – https://lavirgenmecreera.com – https://shewillfind.me ) This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible: Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army. Psalm 2:2-4 «»The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying: ‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.»» Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them. The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be «»the wife of the Lord’s anointed,»» but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down: Isaiah 2:8-11 8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. 9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them. 10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty. 11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day. Proverbs 19:14 House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife. Revelation 1:6 And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. 1 Corinthians 11:7 The woman is the glory of man. What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army? The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of “Authorized Books of Authorized Religions”, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army. Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.Un duro golpe de realidad es a «Babilonia» la «resurrección» de los justos, que es a su vez la reencarnación de Israel en el tercer milenio: La verdad no destruye a todos, la verdad no duele a todos, la verdad no incomoda a todos: Israel, la verdad, nada más que la verdad, la verdad que duele, la verdad que incomoda, verdades que duelen, verdades que atormentan, verdades que destruyen.This is my story: José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose. Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up. On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: «»Who are you?»» Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: «»Jose, who am I?»» Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: «»You are Sandra,»» to which she replied: «»You already know who I am.»» Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it. Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, «»Wait, wait, can we meet?»» That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes. Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up. Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible. Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose. That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, «»I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.»»
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, «»Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.»»
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—»»Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?»»—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, «»So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?»»
José, caught off guard, responded, «»What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!»»
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, «»If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.»»
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
«»How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.»»
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony. █
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://lavirgenmecreera.com,
https://ovni03.blogspot.com, and other blogs.
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old. At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: ovni03.blogspot.com and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
» Pray for whoever insults you,»
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a «»dangerous schizophrenic»» to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
«»This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.»»
Haz clic para acceder a ten-piedad-de-mi-yahve-mi-dios.pdf
»
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .DOCX you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/math21-progam-code-in-turbo-pascal-bestiadn-dot-com.pdf
If R-90=63 then R=153
Entiéndeme 